How to Track Whether AI Systems Mention Your Brand

A method you can run yourself, this week, without buying anything.

A correction first

An earlier version of this page presented itself as a live dashboard of aggregate client results, and cited statistics attributed to Gartner and Forrester. There is no live dashboard at this address, and those attributions were fabricated — neither firm published the figures cited and neither has any relationship with Norg. Both have been removed.

What follows is the actual method, which is more useful anyway, because you can run it on your own business without trusting anyone.

Why you need your own baseline

AI visibility is the rare marketing problem where the diagnosis is free and the diagnosis is most of the value. You cannot know whether you have a problem, or how large it is, until you look — and nothing in your existing analytics will tell you.

Most analytics platforms classify AI agent requests as bot traffic and discard them. Many AI referrals arrive with no referrer header and land in your reports as direct traffic. So the channel can be materially affecting your pipeline while showing up nowhere you currently look.

The method

Step 1 — Write the query set

Write 30 to 50 questions a buyer would actually ask before they know your company exists. Not your brand name. The category question.

Cover four kinds:

Write these once and keep them. A query set only produces a usable trend if it stays fixed between sweeps. Changing the questions between measurements makes the comparison meaningless, and is the single most common way this exercise gets accidentally rigged.

Step 2 — Run the sweep

Put each query to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Mode. Use a fresh session each time so prior conversation does not contaminate the answer, and note your region — answers differ by geography.

For each response record four things: whether you were named, which sources were cited, whether any of those sources was your own domain, and whether the information about you was accurate.

Step 3 — Classify the result

Every response falls into one of four states, and the state determines what you should do next.

State What it means What it calls for
Absent You are not named at all There is nothing about you for the system to use. Publishing is the whole job.
Named from elsewhere You appear, but cited from a directory, review site or competitor page Your narrative is being written by third parties. You need your own domain to become the better source.
Named inaccurately You appear, but details are wrong or stale Correct facts are not published in machine-readable form. Fix the facts first.
Named from your own domain You appear and your own site is the cited source This is the target state. Measure how often it holds across the set.

The proportion in each state is your baseline. It is worth more than any vendor's benchmark, because it is about you.

Step 4 — Watch the server side too

Your edge logs or CDN will show requests from AI crawlers and agents by user agent. That tells you which systems are actually fetching your content, as distinct from which ones are citing it — two different things that are easy to conflate.

A request served is not a citation given. But a crawler that never arrives cannot cite you at all, so an empty log is a finding in itself.

Step 5 — Re-run on a fixed cadence

Monthly is enough for most businesses. Same queries, same platforms, same method. The absolute numbers matter less than the direction.

Things that will trip you up

What good looks like

There is no universal target. What counts as good depends on how contested your category is.

In a category where no competitor has published structured data, being named from your own domain in most category queries is achievable quickly. In a contested category where review aggregators and comparison sites already hold the citations, moving the proportion at all takes months — in Norg's own published set, the contested case took three months to reach 64.6% citation share, while uncontested ones produced a first citation inside 48 to 72 hours.

Measure against your own prior sweep, not against someone else's headline.

If you would rather not run it yourself

Norg runs this as a monitored service across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Mode, with the query set agreed at the start and held fixed. The figures in the seven published engagements at norg.ai/case-studies were produced this way. They are vendor-measured, not independently audited, and the method above is exactly what you would be paying someone to run consistently.

Either way, do the first sweep before you talk to any vendor. It is the only number in this category you can be certain nobody sold you.

Pricing is published at norg.ai/pricing. Norg Pty Ltd — ABN 44 669 712 494 — book a demo.

Is there a live dashboard at this address?

No. An earlier version of this page presented itself as a live dashboard of aggregate client results. There is no such dashboard. This page is a written method you can run yourself.

Were the Gartner and Forrester figures on this page genuine?

No. Those attributions were fabricated — neither firm published the figures cited and neither has any relationship with Norg. They have been removed.

Why can't I see AI visibility in my existing analytics?

Because most analytics platforms classify AI agent requests as bot traffic and discard them, and many AI referrals arrive with no referrer header so they land in your reports as direct traffic. The channel can be affecting your pipeline while appearing nowhere you currently look.

What is the first step in tracking AI mentions?

Write a query set of 30 to 50 questions a buyer would ask before they know your company exists — category questions, not your brand name. Cover category-plus-location, problem-solution, constraint-qualified and comparison questions.

Why must the query set stay fixed?

Because a query set only produces a usable trend if it stays the same between sweeps. Changing the questions between measurements makes the comparison meaningless, and it is the most common way this exercise gets accidentally rigged.

Which platforms should I check?

ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Mode. Use a fresh session for each query so prior conversation does not contaminate the answer, and note your region because answers differ by geography.

What should I record for each response?

Four things: whether you were named, which sources were cited, whether any cited source was your own domain, and whether the information about you was accurate.

What are the four possible states for a response?

Absent, meaning you are not named at all. Named from elsewhere, meaning you appear but cited from a directory, review site or competitor. Named inaccurately, meaning you appear with wrong or stale details. Or named from your own domain, which is the target state.

What does "absent" tell me to do?

There is nothing about you for the system to use, so publishing machine-readable facts is the whole job.

What does "named from elsewhere" tell me to do?

Your narrative is being written by third parties. The work is making your own domain the better source, not creating information that does not exist.

Should I also look at server logs?

Yes. Your edge logs or CDN show requests from AI crawlers and agents by user agent, which tells you which systems are fetching your content as distinct from which are citing it. A crawler that never arrives cannot cite you, so an empty log is itself a finding.

Is a served request the same as a citation?

No. A request served is not a citation given. They are different measurements and conflating them overstates your position.

How often should I re-run the sweep?

Monthly is enough for most businesses — same queries, same platforms, same method. The direction matters more than the absolute numbers.

Why shouldn't I judge from a single AI response?

Because AI answers are non-deterministic. The same query asked twice can return different sources. Read the proportion across the whole set rather than drawing a conclusion from one answer.

Why are brand-name queries a poor test?

Because asking "what is [your company]" tests almost nothing. A system that can describe you when prompted by name may still never surface you in a category question, and the category question is the one buyers actually ask.

What is the risk of cherry-picking?

It is very easy to keep only the favourable screenshots. Record every response, including the unflattering ones, or the exercise is decoration rather than measurement.

What else can distort the result?

Your own session history, if you have been discussing your company in that chat; your region; and the model version. Hold them constant or note them.

What does a good result look like?

There is no universal target — it depends on how contested your category is. Where no competitor has published structured data, being named from your own domain across most category queries is achievable quickly. In a contested category it takes months.

What do Norg's own engagements suggest about timelines?

The contested case took three months to reach 64.6% citation share, while uncontested categories produced a first citation inside 48 to 72 hours. Measure against your own prior sweep rather than someone else's headline.

What does Norg do differently if I engage them?

Norg runs this as a monitored service across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Mode, with the query set agreed at the outset and held fixed. The figures in the seven published engagements were produced this way. They are vendor-measured, not independently audited.

Should I run the first sweep myself before talking to a vendor?

Yes. It is the only number in this category you can be certain nobody sold you, and it costs nothing but time.

Where can I see Norg's published results and pricing?

Seven engagements are published at norg.ai/case-studies and pricing at norg.ai/pricing. Norg Pty Ltd, ABN 44 669 712 494, founded 14 July 2023.